Policy Overview

The methane emissions charge saw several unsuccessful legislative attempts, first appearing as a separate bill, and then adopted into the Build Back Better Act in 2021, prior to its inception as part of the Methane Emissions Reduction Program under the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. The fee is applicable to facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of CO2e or more annually of $900 per ton of methane emitted from any facility in 2024, increasing annually in increments to $1,500 in 2026. It is complementary to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2022 Methane Regulation announced in November 2021, in that companies that don't comply with the regulation will be subject to the fee. The methane fee also covers a wider scope of oil and gas operations in comparison to the EPA’s regulation, such as offshore facilities and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals.

Policy Status

Methane Emissions Charge adopted as part of Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022.

Evidence Profile

201020

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

The aggregated evidence of corporate and industry lobbying on the Methane Emissions Charge shows negative engagement from oil and gas companies and industry associations.

Long-term Lobbying Trends

  • Several key oil and gas sector industry associations are opposing or lobbying to weaken the Methane Emissions Charge, such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), American Gas Association (AGA), and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM).

  • Industry associations sent joint letters to US policymakers voicing opposition the methane fee, citing concerns of competitiveness, costs, and affordability. A September 2021 joint letter to the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, led by the API, and signed by 130 organizations including the AFPM stated the fee would result in “adverse environmental and economic impacts.”

  • Oppositional positions have frequently argued for direct methane regulation as the best approach to tackle methane emissions from the oil and gas industry. Both the API and AGA in 2021 labelled a potential methane fee as duplicative of EPA regulations. However, InfluenceMap has identified significant opposition to the EPA’s 2022 Methane Regulations from the both cross-sector and oil and gas sector industry associations.

  • The key narrative used by industry to advocate against the Methane Emissions Charge has been claiming that methane regulation would impact energy supply and security. For example, in August 2022, the API argued that the fee would increase production costs and impact energy supply in a time of US energy demand increase. InfluenceMap’s Narrative Tracker analyzes the use of narratives on methane regulation here.

  • There has been limited support of the methane fee in corporate engagement with the policy, Shell supported the final version of the fee in the Inflation Reduction Act. However, it is unclear if the company supported the fee in its earlier iterations.

Impacts on Policy Ambition

Despite the Methane Emissions Charge eventually passing via the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act’s Methane Emissions Reduction Program, significant lobbying from the oil and gas industry saw the fee watered down. In its final version, the fee is only applicable to facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of CO2e or more annually, creating the possibility that it may overlook a high proportion of oil and gas facilities producing fewer emissions. Alongside exemptions for facilities that comply with the EPA’s 2022 Methane Regulation, industry pressure has ensured exemptions for gas infrastructure that provide energy to homes and businesses, and facilities that sell volumes of gas below a certain threshold, while also more broadly providing incentives to the oil and gas industry of up to $1.5bn to clean up methane under the Inflation Reduction Act.

Policy Status

Methane Emissions Charge adopted as part of Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022.

Evidence Profile

201020

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Live Lobbying Alerts

AFPM opposes climate provisions under the Inflation Reduction Act

03 November 2022

In a blog post released on 11th August, the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) announced its opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act being considered in the House. The blog post detailed its specific opposition to climate provisions, including the electric vehicle tax credit and the methane fee.

US entities engage on the Build Back Better Act

03 November 2022

In the Q2 2022 federal lobbying disclosures published on July 20th for American Gas Association and Edison Electric Institute with utilities CenterPoint, AES Corporation, American Electric Power Company, DTE Energy, Edison International, Exelon, FirstEnergy, NextEra, Pacific Gas & Electric, PPL Corporation, Public Service Enterprise Group, Southern Company, Vistra Corp, and Xcel Energy and Entergy, published on July 20th, disclosed the companies direct engagement with policymakers on the Build Back Better Act’s proposed methane fee without disclosing a clear position.

In the Q2 2022 federal lobbying disclosures for Ameren Corp and Duke Energy both utilities stated direct engagement with policymakers on the Build Back Better Act’s clean energy tax credits without disclosing any clear positions on the legislation. In the same disclosure, Duke also listed engagement activities on the “natural gas provisions” of the Build Back Better Act without providing any description of its position. In Consolidated Edison’s federal lobbying report for Q2 2022, published on July 20th, the utility stated direct engagement on the electric vehicle provisions of the Build Back Better Act without disclosing a clear position. The reports highlight the industry’s private engagement and lack of transparency on specific climate provisions of the reconciliation bill, which remains stalled in Congress.

These lobbying reports demonstrate strong industry engagement on the reconciliation bill, which remains stalled in negotiation following inconsistent statements from Senator Manchin.

Entities Engaged on Policy

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationEngagement Intensity
DEntergy Corp28UtilitiesNorth America
D-Ameren Corp21UtilitiesNorth America
ECenterPoint Energy18UtilitiesNorth America
D-ConocoPhillips38EnergyNorth America
C+DuPont33ChemicalsNorth America
C+Goldman Sachs14FinancialsNorth America
CShell64EnergyEurope